Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Matthew Griffith's avatar

I heard somewhere the people keep buying books they’ll never read because they romanticize the idea that one day they’ll have the free time to sit down and read a book.

I think it’s often the same idea in golf, we buy a new driver or any club for that matter romanticizing the idea that this might be the key that unlocks the fairway.

Colin Shellard's avatar

I'll be intrigued to see what metric you use for ranking them Keith. I know my tendency when testing drivers is to remove all the worst shots and compare the best 5-10 drives from each driver, seeing which gives me the best ball speed, most optimum spin numbers etc. in order to see which one has the capacity to go the furthest on a god hit, which is what I expect most people do when considering a new driver (without the help of a fitter). I suspect, and knowing what you have looked at in the past, what we should do is also consider the dispersion on "all" of the shots (I'll let you take out the cold top if you must😉) and see which driver produces the most consistent results and decide which dispersion pattern is best for your game.

That might be a driver that produces a smaller l-r pattern, but is slightly shorter, or for some people depending on the courses they play they may prefer to accept an increase in l-r dispersion with a 10y longer average. Horses for courses....

For me I want a driver that when I stand on the tee, I'm looking at my target spot and have the confidence to swing it freely and believe I can hit it there. Not be worrying that I might pull it, or slice it into the trees / OOB.

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?